|
The Christian Observer - 9400 Fairview Avenue - Manassas,
VA 20110 (703) 335-2844 The History of the Christian Observer
|
|
Westminster Larger Catechism # 57 Commentary by Dr. Chuck Baynard
Q57. What benefits has Christ procured by his mediation? Answer: Christ, by his mediation, has procured redemption, with all other benefits of the covenant of grace. References: Heb. 9:12; 2 Cor. 1:20. Here we begin a section that could properly be labeled soteriology, or having to do with salvation. The Divines in this and the following thirty-two questions deal with redemption in some detail. This opening question is too broad to try and deal with alone, and needs the space granted in so many questions on one topic. Here we will find the division between the reformed church and all others. The TULIP will be laid before us in all her glory shining through the curtain of darkness other theologies would attempt to cover her with. What are the benefits procured by Christ? That defies human ability to list, much less fully understand. We have to begin with the total depravity of petal one. How fallen is man? Completely so and to an extent that he cannot save himself. God looked upon the world once and saw this total depravity and destroyed the earth, save eight souls by water. Apart from the mediation of Christ, this would be true today. God having at this time made a covenant with Noah, but more especially with creation. Noah as representative of man at this point in revealed history was the "official" recipient, but the covenant was with creation; "I will never again curse the ground for mans sake, although the imagination of man"s heart is evil from his youth; nor will I again destroy every living thing as I have done" (Gen. 8:21). Man is evil in the imagination of his heart, in every thought he has, every dream, every idea. This brokenness also extends to the physical condition of man. We will see God limit the actual life of man, later in the story of redemption revealed in Scripture because of this corruption of the perfection in which he was created. There remains not one part of man that is not corrupt. This has not changed, and except for the covering of the blood of Jesus Christ, surely all can see that God would long ago have destroyed the wickedness from before His holy altar. The story of redemption as outlined in the TULIP is not only beautiful in its completeness and revelation of Gods grace, it also lays before us the correct sequence of thought to understand the story, and the necessity of all five petals. Thus all of nature awaits the manifestation of the sons of God, that the curse may be lifted, having no other remedy, not even that of destruction until in the fullness of time, God lifts the curse, as He makes known His children begotten in Jesus Christ. From the foundation of the total depravity of man flows the necessity of the unconditional election of the second petal. Few words are needed to show the necessity of it being unconditional after due consideration of the evil within and about man from the fall onward. We then must be careful as we present Gods truth, not to confuse others by holding forth a false hope of choice. Man will not accept this because of his fallen nature. As noted earlier, let us harken to Paul and use due caution and restraint in teaching the points of this we have come to know as the Reformed TULIP, that which Paul called election and predestination. Nonetheless the second petal stands and it is only by grace that God chose to save any, and the doctrine of unconditional election was established by the word of God, lest any should boast. The third petal, that of limited atonement also brings much debate among men. I choose to use a simple rhetorical question when faced with this question of limited atonement; "Will there be any souls of men in hell?" The answer cannot be any other than the affirmative for this is clear from Scripture. This being affirmative, then the atonement must be limited, for what God says, He can and will do. It remains for us a men then to understand the atonement is limited and to weave a theology that fits the truth of Gods word, not our own vain and proud imaginations. The fourth petal of irresistible grace flows from the first three as naturally as rain falls from heaven. Man in his fallen condition, being hindered in all his faculties would not recognize the need for much less accept the gracious gift given, limited or otherwise. God thus in choosing some, must irresistibly call them to Himself, or they would forever wander lost in the vanities of their own making. The most obvious example being Saul of Tarsus, who by the "choice" of God became Paul the Apostle. It is sad that with the record before us, we like Paul must lose even what feeble sight we have, to gain a more clear vision of all that is holy and good. Even this restored vision being hindered by the flesh and the remains of fleshly sin in our nature. Perseverance of the saints remains as the capstone to this beautiful story of redemption from the pen of God. What God has set in place, no other can remove. The decree of the Sovereign of the universe cannot be appealed nor set aside by any other. Perhaps a shadow of this can be seen in the laws of the United States whereby a convicted killer that has been sentenced to death must have that sentence appealed. That the killer himself asks that the appeal process cease and the penalty be carried out, is not enough to stay the process without the approval of the courts that inflicted the sentence. Herein we see that the convicted has no choice, even of death, much less of life. Likewise, the choice to grant pardon belongs to God, and it would only be from this same court that an appeal could be prosecuted. God does not change and His gifts are without shadow or turning. God has decreed life to the elect, and there is no power that can reverse that decree. To the question that always comes from this declaration from the detractors of the reformed faith, "Do you mean a person can murder someone and still go to heaven?" Absolutely, heaven will be populated with forgiven sinners. Can you name the sin that the blood of Christ does not cover, the one sin of blasphemy of the Holy Spirit being excepted? The truth is, sin continues to abide within the flesh, even of the redeemed, and thus we have need for the constant and continuous mediator, Jesus Christ. The church wears a human face! My love for the Westminster Standards comes from this ability to see the fullness of the reformed faith, laid on the foundation of Gods Word, flow from every clause they set in place. Much gratitude is owed to these saints of the past, who have so completely laid open the truth of the Scripture before us. It is for this reason that when I differ with the Divines, I find it is time to sit and contemplate what they have said, and search the Scriptures to see if these things be true. The standards are not Scripture, though they should hold a special place of respect and so influence our own endeavors to understand Gods revealed truth. Being secondary, we may differ, but let us do so with caution and much prayer. What peace and comfort, now, today, belongs to us when we understand what benefit the mediation of Christ has procured as understood from the reformed perspective. We are given the freedom to be about our Masters work, as we eagerly await His soon return. No other understanding of the Scriptures is as complete, all leaving gaps and space for debate. A practical truth is that over the years I have spent as much time trying to bring this understanding of Gods sure and permanent plan of redemption to those who in my limited abilities, I considered to be of the elect. Assurance of faith is useless if it can all be lightly tossed aside by the fallen mind and nature of man. Without this eternal assurance, we live a life of fear and bondage. Yet Holy Writ declares that perfect love casts out all fear. God has loved us perfectly and completely. Let us then, along with the Divines, look at each point in this love manifested to us by way of the covenant of grace in the next thirty questions and answers from this beloved work of the Westminster standards. Dr. Chuck Baynard -- May 1998
|