Home | Search |Sermons | 2nd Helvetic | Westminster Larger   
Sabbath School
| Colleges | Features | E-Mail Conferences | Presbyterian Perspectives  
Links
| Book Reviews | Directories | Staff-Contacts | Belgic Confession  
E-Mail News  |  Biblical Theology Lessons | Calvin's Institutes | History

The Christian Observer - 9400 Fairview Avenue - Manassas, VA 20110  (703) 335-2844
Dr. Edwin Elliott, Managing Editor
Reformed Journal of Record since 1813  -- $27.00 US  per year (12 Issues)

The History of the Christian Observer

The Second Helvetic Confession    Chapter 29

Of Celibacy, Marriage and the Management of Domestic Affairs [1]

Single People. Those who have the gift of celibacy from heaven, so that from the heart or with their whole soul are pure and continent and are not aflame with passion, let them serve the Lord in that calling, as long as they feel endued with that divine gift; and let them not lift up themselves above others, but let them serve the Lord continuously in simplicity and humility (I Cor. 7:7 ff.). For such are more apt to attend to divine things than those who are distracted with the private affairs of a family. But if, again, the gift be taken away, and they feel a continual burning, let them call to mind the words of the apostle: It is better to marry than to be aflame (I Cor. 7:9).

 

<The only thing of note here to me is the phrase “if the gift be taken away” this is not possible since the gifts of God are without shadow or turning.  However it is more likely that on first approach one might take the words of the apostle more seriously and foolishly attempt to live as a single person which later proves not to be the will of God.  Of greater import however is that we see that celibacy is not the biblical standard, but is the exception to God’s creation mandate for man to fill and manage the world God has given man.  Some have wrongly decided this meant that clergy should be celibate.  They are simply wrong and there is no such command in the Bible. Such policies of clergy celibacy have caused much abuse and shame to the church through the ages as men who sincerely entered into such arrangements without the true gift from God have found themselves more easily tempted into gross sin against God. >

Marriage. For marriage (which is the medicine of incontinency, and continency itself) was instituted by the Lord God himself, who blessed it most bountifully, and willed man and woman to cleave one to the other inseparably, and to live together in complete love and concord (Matt. 19:4 ff). Whereupon we know that the apostle said: Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled (Heb. 13:4). And again: If a girl marries, she does not sin (I Cor. 7:28). We therefore condemn polygamy, and those who condemn second marriages.

 

<The condemnation of second marriages is important to us.  In a generation where this is the norm so to speak it must be approached most cautiously.  The standard of God is one woman and one man for life.  Because of the sinful nature of mankind this standard is all but nonexistent among the nations.  While most people will have no problem with the reference to widows, whom the apostle specifically treats, many, if not most commentators falter about remarriage after divorce.  Some even go, as far to say that all divorce means the couple involved will continue life as singles.  Christ gave one exception, and some even deny this for remarriage saying Christ only permitted the divorce not the remarriage.  I believe they err and it is permissible after repentance for the moral failure of rashly entering into a marriage, and proper counseling for all divorced to be remarried, placing the failure (sin) under the blood of Christ.  It is said such a policy will encourage divorce.  I deny this is truth, for the elect of God will be most concerned with obeying God and make all attempts to live with one woman in marriage overcoming all difficulties that appear later in the marriage. >

How Marriages Are To Be Contracted. We teach that marriages are to be lawfully contracted in the fear of the Lord, and not against the laws which forbid certain degrees of consanguinity, lest the marriages should be incestuous. Let marriages be made with consent of the parents, or of those who take the place of parents, and above all for that purpose for which the Lord instituted marriages. Moreover, let them be kept holy with the utmost faithfulness, piety, love and purity of those joined together. Therefore let them guard against quarrels, dissensions, lust and adultery.

 

<Marriage is not a sacrament of the church.  It is not even a ceremony of the church as such.  It is however a most solemn event in the life of humankind and because God has personally created marriage for the good of mankind, and used the same as an illustration of His relationship to man and Christ to the church, it is proper for the marriage to only be finalized by the church and that after prayer and mature counseling with some passage of time in courtship to determine God’s will in such a union for life.[2]>

Matrimonial Forum. Let lawful courts be established in the Church, and holy judges who may care for marriages, and may repress all unchastity and shamefulness, and before whom matrimonial disputes may be settled.

 

<Our cultures have changed and the courts of the church given into the hands of civil government in this area, this does not lessen the place of the church in marriage.  We can point to the fact that the civil government has overstepped its authority and entered into the realm of God and His church in taking control of who may legally marry whom, but ultimately the church is not relieved of her responsibility to teach and practice marriage in all its singleness of purpose and holiness as instructed by God.  The church in one sense has no authority to refuse to recognize the state since it is commanded that the Christian obey the laws of the land (civil magistrate), which are by God’s providence and of God for the good of the covenant family.  Nonetheless it is sin for a Christian couple to enter lightly into marriage and that outside the church without proper oversight of both family and the overseers of the church appointed by God for just this purpose. >

The Rearing of Children. Children are to be brought up by the parents in the fear of the Lord; and parents are to provide for their children, remembering the saying of the apostle: If anyone does not provide for his relatives, he has disowned the faith and is worse than an unbeliever (I Tim. 5:8). But especially they should teach their children honest trades or professions by which they may support themselves. They should keep them from idleness and in all these things instill in them true faith in God, lest through a lack of confidence or too much security or filthy greed they become dissolute and achieve no success.

 

<This is a strong and definite statement that has not changed throughout the history of God’s people.  It needs attention, not comment nor change. >

And it is most certain that works which are done by parents in true faith by way of domestic duties and the management of their households are in God's sight holy and truly good works. They are no less pleasing to God than prayers, fasting and almsgiving. For thus the apostle has taught in his epistles, especially in those to Timothy and Titus. And with the same apostle we account the doctrine of those who forbid marriage or openly castigate or indirectly discredit it, as if it were not holy and pure, among the doctrine of demons (I Tim. 4:1).

 

<It is written that God prepared the good works before hand for the believer to walk in.  Thus it is a biblical truth that proper rearing of children will always be in the will of God and considered good works.  It is also a great truth that such works or doing of the Gospel so to speak are greater than any other act of giving on the part of the believer.  This is completely in line with Paul’s comment concerning the giving of self as a living sacrifice, and that the believer’s only reasonable service.[3]>

We also detest an impure single life, the secret and open lusts and fornications of hypocrites pretending to be continent when they are the most incontinent of all. All these God will judge. We do not disapprove of riches or rich men, if they be godly and use their riches well. But we reject the sect of the Apostolicals, etc..

 

<Again, here is another place where current heresies are addressed by name in the Helvetic.[4]  It is also an area that needs much attention today.  Not only does this confession say the Swiss churches detest co-habitation or other sexual sins, it points to the source of all truth the Bible where we see sexual immorality on the hate list of God personally.  These things must be given no place or tolerance in the church. Yet in the modern churches we find egalitarianism, homosexuality, co-habitation and other heresies not only tolerated, but also encouraged. Surely if it were possible our forefathers would be turning over in their graves at such impure actions being not only condoned but propagated in a church called by the name of the Savior of the world. >


[1]  WCF XXIV all

[2]  Calvin – Institutes – Book 2. Chapter 19. Sect. 34 (Marriage is not a sacrament)  Book 2. Chapter 8. Sect. 44; Book 4. Chapter 12. Sect 25 (In general).

[3]  Romans 12:1

[4]  It is unclear whether the author of the Second Helvetic Confession is referring to the Church of Rome where we find several “apostolic doctrines” or to one of several ancient sects that applied this name to themselves in one form or another.