|
The Christian Observer - 9400 Fairview Avenue - Manassas,
VA 20110 (703) 335-2844 The History of the Christian Observer
|
|
The Second Helvetic Confession - Chapter 21 Of the Holy Supper of the Lord [1] The Supper of the Lord. The Supper of the Lord (which is called the Lord's Table, and the Eucharist, that is, a Thanksgiving), is, therefore, usually called a supper, because it was instituted by Christ at his last supper, and still represents it, and because in it the faithful are spiritually fed and given drink. <The Lord’s Table is similar to the Passover of the Old Testament because as the Jewish Passover was constituted to bring to remembrance to the Jewish people God’s grace in passing over them during the plagues on Egypt as well as God’s mighty work of redemption in leading the Jewish nation out of slavery in Egypt to freely serve God before Mount Sinai; so Jesus Christ became the Passover lamb for the Christian Church redeeming the elect from the bondage of sin. [2]> The Author and Consecrator of the Supper. For the author of the Supper of the Lord is not an angel or any man, but the Son of God himself, our Lord Jesus Christ, who first consecrated it to his Church. And the same consecration or blessing still remains along all those who celebrate no other but that very Supper which the Lord instituted, and at which they repeat the words of the Lord's Supper, and in all things look to the one Christ by a true faith, from whose hands they receive, as it were, what they receive through the ministry of the ministers of the Church. <This was covered under the sacraments in general and baptism. Nonetheless, let us once more declare that the outward signs in the serving of the table or concerning the person who serves have nothing to do with the efficacy of the supper, but Jesus Christ who instituted the supper alone give it benefit and power, to those who come in true faith alone. [3]> A Memorial of God's Benefits. By this sacred rite the Lord wishes to keep in fresh remembrance that greatest benefit which he showed to mortal men, namely, that by having given his body and shed his blood he has pardoned all our sins, and redeemed us from eternal death and the power of the devil, and now feeds us with his flesh, and give us his blood to drink, which, being received spiritually by true faith, nourish us to eternal life. And this so great a benefit is renewed as often as the Lord's Supper is celebrated. For the Lord said: Do this in remembrance of me. This holy Supper also seals to us that the very body of Christ was truly given for us, and his blood shed for the remission of our sins, lest our faith should in any way waver. <Here is a sign and seal of the entrance into the covenant of grace, made by God before the foundation of the earth with Jesus Christ on behalf of the elect. In the supper the elect have union with Christ, which is the full benefit of Christ’s death and resurrection. [4] > The Sign and Thing Signified. And this is visibly represented by this sacrament outwardly through the ministers, and, as it were, presented to our eyes to be seen, which is invisibly wrought by the Holy Spirit inwardly in the soul. Bread is outwardly offered by the minister, and the words of the Lord are heard: Take, eat; this is my body; and, Take and divide among you. Drink of it, all of you; this is my blood. Therefore the faithful receive what is given by the ministers of the Lord, and they eat the bread of the Lord and drink of the Lord's cup. At the same time by the work of Christ through the Holy Spirit they also inwardly receive the flesh and blood of the Lord, and are thereby nourished unto life eternal. For the flesh and blood of Christ is the true food and drink unto life eternal; and Christ himself, since he was given for us and is our Savior, is the principal thing in the Supper, and we do not permit anything else to be substituted in his place. But in order to understand better and more clearly how the flesh and blood of Christ are the food and drink of the faithful, and are received by the faithful unto eternal life, we would add these few things. There is more than one kind of eating. There is corporeal eating whereby food is taken into the mouth, is chewed with the teeth, and swallowed into the stomach. In times past the Capernaites thought that the flesh of the Lord should be eaten in this way, but they are refuted by him in John, ch. 6. For as the flesh of Christ cannot be eaten corporeally without infamy and savagery, so it is not food for the stomach. All men are forced to admit this. We therefore disapprove of that canon in the Pope's decrees, Ego Berengarius (De Consecrat., Dist. 2). For neither did godly antiquity believe, nor do we believe, that the body of Christ is to be eaten corporeally and essentially with a bodily mouth. <[5]At the time of Christ’s temptation Christ said to Satan, “Man shall not live by bread alone but every word that comes from the mouth of God.” The words of Christ in reply to Satan were not new; Christ repeated the words of the Father in the Old Testament. [6] Christ as the divine Logos recognized by John in the Gospel of his name is the Word of God. [7] Likewise Christ said to his disciples in the Gospel unless they ate of this flesh and drank of his blood they had no life in them. [8] This makes the sacrament of the Lord’s Table the most spiritual thing available to man. The Spirit of Christ isn’t in the miracles, signs, or any other thing of the earth or church. In that Christ is the Word and Christ is the substance of life, we also see here why the sacrament is not to be separated from the Word, and again why the title attached to God’s ministers is Word and sacrament. In this sense Christ is the sacrament, and more so with the Lord’s Table. > Spiritual Eating of the Lord. There is also a spiritual eating of Christ's body; not such that we think that thereby the food itself is to be changed into spirit, but whereby the body and blood of the Lord, while remaining in their own essence and property, are spiritually communicated to us, certainly not in a corporeal but in a spiritual way, by the Holy Spirit, who applies and bestows upon us these things which have been prepared for us by the sacrifice of the Lord's body and blood for us, namely, the remission of sins, deliverance, and eternal life; so that Christ lives in us and we live in him, and he causes us to receive him by true faith to this end that he may become for us such spiritual food and drink, that is, our life. <Again the sign of the sacraments, the outward sign, points to the inward faith and substance of Christ. There have been many variations on the bread and wine mystically changing form such as noted above. This is pure nonsense and of no use at all. The elements are those used by Christ, bread and wine. There has been much debate through the ages concerning what is in the cup and if the bread is leavened or not. Do we think it was wine or grape juice in the cup handled by Christ? I think all but the most profane would say it was wine. Is grape juice the same? I say yes, both are fruit of the vine, and depending on how early in the harvest or how heavily the wine had been watered down, the alcohol content may have been quite insignificant. The Bible doesn’t say it must be wine as in fermented or alcoholic substance. Likewise, when we consider the bread, was it unleavened? Most likely it was unleavened but this depends on this last supper being the Passover supper. There is debate about it being the actual Passover supper but part of the longer preparation for the Passover. These are trivial concerns at best and not essential elements. There are many in the Reformed churches that will argue these points, and decry the error I teach here. They do depart from the tradition of the reformation not I. I but share the sentiments of Calvin who taught in a similar fashion concerning the actual elements used in the Lord’s Supper. [9] > Christ as Our Food Sustains Us in Life. For even as bodily food and drink not only refresh and strengthen our bodies, but also keeps them alive, so the flesh of Christ delivered for us, and his blood shed for us, not only refresh and strengthen our souls, but also preserve them alive, not in so far as they are corporeally eaten and drunken, but in so far as they are communicated unto us spiritually by the Spirit of God, as the Lord said: The bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh (John 6:51), and the flesh (namely what is eaten bodily) is of no avail; it is the spirit that gives life (v. 63). And: The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life. <In other words as bread, meat, and other earthly foods nourish the physical body so do the elements of the Lord’s Table nourish your soul. To neglect the Table of the Lord is to neglect the lifeblood of the soul and flee from the comfort and protection of God. All men seek peace on earth. Yet, there can be no peace while Christ is absent. Likewise there is no peace of soul when the means of grace provided in the Lord’s Table are neglected. One can only sit in amazement at the lack of fear of God and foolishness of the modern church that struggles to find a place in their busy schedule to serve the table of the Lord. In many churches many consider a quarterly celebration too often. Should we wonder then why the church as a whole is so beggarly and lacks power against the prince of this world? Our forefathers found it fit to serve the table as often as the church gathered. The fathers of the Reformed church transformed the whole world. > Christ Received by Faith. And as we must by eating receive food into our bodies in order that it may work in us, and prove its efficacy in us - since it profits us nothing when it remains outside us - so it is necessary that we receive Christ by faith, that he may become ours, and he may live in us and we in him. For he says: I am the bread of life; he who comes to me shall not hunger, and he who believes in me shall never thirst (John 6:35); and also, He who eats me will live because of me . . . he abides in me, I in him (vs. 57, 56). <Can this be worded more clearly? I think not! The last comet gives us pragmatic proof from the life and experience of the church that this is truth. The Bible gives us proof from the Word of God. One can only wonder then why the table is neglected or fought over instead of set before the congregation that all might grow in faith and grace. > Spiritual Food. From all this it is clear that by spiritual food we do not mean some imaginary food I know not what, but the very body of the Lord given to us, which nevertheless is received by the faithful not corporeally, but spiritually by faith. In this matter we follow the teaching of the Savior himself, Christ the Lord, according to John, ch. 6. <This seems redundant, however, the problems the church faces today are not new, and the problems have existed from the birth of the church and in many ways before in the synagogues of the Jewish people. Man does it his way, and chides all that do not agree with him. Every person strives to be first or higher, or superior to all others. Pride and ego go before the fall. We see the same thing in the argument among the inner circle of Christ just before Christ gives Himself as the perfect sacrifice. [10] When will we understand the Word and sacrament are one, and this is indeed the bread of life? Is this so hard to understand or accept? [11]> Eating Necessary for Salvation. And this eating of the flesh and drinking of the blood of the Lord is so necessary for salvation that without it no man can be saved. But this spiritual eating and drinking also occurs apart from the Supper of the Lord, and as often and wherever a man believes in Christ. To which that sentence of St. Augustine's perhaps applies: "Why do you provide for your teeth and your stomach? Believe, and you have eaten." <Here I disagree most heartily with my learned forefather in faith. It is true that the soul of the regenerated will thirst and hunger for this very food, but it is not so tied to the order of salvation as to preclude salvation. This would leave in man’s hand that which could set aside the election. Not to be! God has made the decree and it will be. I accept lesser lines here, as in this is normally a part of salvation, when explained in proper order of salvation. I disagree none can be saved apart from the supper. A man can neglect the Lord’s Table and have no affect on his eternal resting place. He will reap the whirlwind so to speak in his inner life and know the turmoil and confusion of the devil during his earthly life, but it will not set aside the election of God. Nonetheless, in agreement with the author here, Word and sacrament cannot be divided and in the sense that salvation is by the Word of God I come to some point of agreement. For this very reason we have systematic theology, whereby things spiritual are set into a supposed order or sequence of events. For the most part this is an attempt to divide things so the finite mind of man can grasp and understand them. The truth is most are so closely tied together such divisions do not exist. This is not unlike the war that has raged for centuries concerning justification by faith alone where many attempt to pit Paul against James and argue that it isn’t faith alone, but faith and works, or at least the two connected together. The error here is that it is stated most clearly that salvation (justification) is by faith. [12] However, it is a truth as James notes that the faithful will produce good works. Three times the Bible says the just shall live by faith. To live is to work and therefore to be just is to work. The Ephesians two passage clearly teaches that God prepared these good works before the foundation of the world for the faithful to walk in. Likewise we can say that the saved will not neglect the table but I do not think we can say to neglect the table means a person cannot be saved since only the saved that has properly examined himself should be at the table.[13] Sacramental Eating of the Lord. Besides the higher spiritual eating there is also a sacramental eating of the body of the Lord by which not only spiritually and internally the believer truly participates in the true body and blood of the Lord, but also, by coming to the Table of the Lord, outwardly receives the visible sacrament of the body and blood of the Lord. To be sure, when the believer believed, he first received the life-giving food, and still enjoys it. But therefore, when he now receives the sacrament, he does not receive nothing. For he progresses in continuing to communicate in the body and blood of the Lord, and so his faith is kindled and grows more and more, and is refreshed by spiritual food. For while we live, faith is continually increased. And he who outwardly receives the sacrament by true faith, not only receives the sign, but also, as we said, enjoys the thing itself. Moreover, he obeys the Lord's institution and commandment, and with a joyful mind gives thanks for his redemption and that of all mankind, and makes a faithful memorial to the Lord's death, and gives a witness before the Church, of whose body he is a member. Assurance is also given to those who receive the sacrament that the body of the Lord was given and his blood shed, not only for men in general, but particularly for every faithful communicant, to whom it is food and drink unto eternal life. <Notice the reference to the sign and seal of both sacraments of the church. There is an outward sign and an inward seal of the Holy Spirit. The sacraments are properly called means of grace because of the testimony of the Holy Spirit to and with the spirit of man in the sacraments. Man does grown in faith and spirit, grace is added in the sacraments. So thus it is not only spiritual, but also a physical thing to the individual properly coming to the Table of the Lord.> Unbelievers Take the Sacrament to Their Judgment. But he who comes to this sacred Table of the Lord without faith, communicates only in the sacrament and does not receive the substance of the sacrament whence comes life and salvation; and such men unworthily eat of the Lord's Table. Whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord, and eats and drinks judgment upon himself (I Cor. 11:26-29). For when they do not approach with true faith, they dishonor the death of Christ, and therefore eat and drink condemnation to themselves. <The Word is clear and to unworthily partake is to eat and drink condemnation to self. End debate, God has spoken. Paul told the church at Corinth that many of them were sick and some had died because of this unworthy approach to the table. This is as true today as it was in the day of Paul. We live in a natural world and the there are natural events and sicknesses that lead to death. We do not want to fall into the error of the early Jews as evidenced in the book of Job and blame all bad things that happen to faithful people on their lack of faith or for having sin in their lives. Nonetheless it is a great truth that to corrupt the table by coming unworthily does open this box from hell so to speak and man will know disease and deaths that could have been avoided. The actual wording of drinking and eating condemnation to self however speaks of the eternal home of the soul more than the condition of the physical body of this world. > The Presence of Christ in the Supper. We do not, therefore, so join the body of the Lord and his blood with the bread and wine as to say that the bread itself is the body of Christ except in a sacramental way; or that the body of Christ is hidden corporeally under the bread, so that it ought to be worshipped under the form of bread; or yet that whoever receives the sign, receives also the thing itself. The body of Christ is in heaven at the right hand of the Father; and therefore our hearts are to be lifted up on high, and not to be fixed on the bread, neither is the Lord to be worshipped in the bread. Yet the Lord is not absent from his Church when she celebrates the Supper. The sun, which is absent from us in the heavens, is notwithstanding effectually present among us. How much more is the Sun of Righteousness, Christ, although in his body he is absent from us in heaven, present with us, nor corporeally, but spiritually, by his vivifying operation, and as he himself explained at his Last Supper that he would be present with us (John, chs. 14; 15; and 16). Whence it follows that we do not have the Supper without Christ, and yet at the same time have an unbloody and mystical Supper, as it was universally called by antiquity. <Here is another redundant statement. However in the day of Bullinger and the early reformers the beliefs and practices of the roman Church was widely known and accepted. They constantly fought against this heresy concerning the actual presence of Christ in or under the elements of the table. In our day we have this same teaching in abundance, as the Roman Church remains the largest and most widely spread of Christian Churches. We should not forget that the reasons for the reformation of the sixteenth century have not disappeared. To boldly hold and contend for this faith once delivered should be as important to us today as then. It appears however that for the most part the evangelical churches continue to divide over minor issues while these major deficiencies for the most part go unattended. > Other Purposes of the Lord's Supper. Moreover, we are admonished in the celebration of the Supper of the Lord to be mindful of whose body we have become members, and that, therefore, we may be of one mind with all the brethren, live a holy life, and not pollute ourselves with wickedness and strange religions; but, persevering in the true faith to the end of our life, strive to excel in holiness of life. <Not only are we called to remember who and what we are in Christ and to live accordingly, we are enabled by the presence of the Holy Spirit to more faithfully do these things. There is an ability connected with the exercise of the faith given by God that not only works salvation, but also enables man to do what God requires. Thus it is a truth that in Christ we can do all things and apart from Christ we can do no good thing. As often as we confess our sins, God forgives our sins. In this sense, having examined self in preparation to come to the table we find we are at the most pure or perfect condition we as humans can attain. In faith we can please God and know all these benefits of being in Christ. It is written that without faith we cannot please God. God does not leave man alone in the performance of this most necessary soul searching and repentance in the preparation for the table. God has promised that the Holy Spirit will pray for us. The Holy Spirit will pray for those things we don’t know we need or how to ask God for. It is a fantastic truth that God has never asked mankind for anything that God did not first provide. > Preparation for the Supper. It is therefore fitting that when we would come to the Supper, we first examine ourselves according to the commandment of the apostle, especially as to the kind of faith we have, whether we believe that Christ has come to save sinners and to call them to repentance, and whether each man believes that he is in the number of those who have been delivered by Christ and saved; and whether he is determined to change his wicked life, to lead a holy life, and with the Lord's help to persevere in the true religion and in harmony with the brethren, and to give due thanks to God for his deliverance. <The note here concerning “with God’s help” is crucial. In the flesh doubt and sin will cloud the perspective and man’s often shortcomings would frustrate even the most faithful. As we remember Christ who brought salvation to us by this very flesh and blood, we can also remember the promises that accompany this great salvation. Left to self man will fail every time. In Christ we are more than conquerors and cannot fail. > The Observance of the Supper with Both Bread and Wine. We think that rite, manner, or form of the Supper to be the most simple and excellent which comes nearest to the first institution of the Lord and to the apostles' doctrine. It consists in proclaiming the Word of God, in godly prayers, in the action of the Lord himself, and its repetition, in the eating of the Lord's body and drinking of his blood; in a fitting remembrance of the Lord's death, and a faithful thanksgiving; and in a holy fellowship in the union of the body of the Church. <To which I add we are to remember the overall table itself implies the mutual love, for Christ and one another. Calvin in the reformation declared this truth. A truth that embraced will bring a halt to much of the strife and division that face the evangelical churches today. [14] We therefore disapprove of those who have taken from the faithful one species of the sacrament, namely, the Lord's cup. For these seriously offend against the institution of the Lord who says: Drink ye all of this (Matt. 26:27); which he did not so expressly say of the bread. We are not now discussing what kind of mass once existed among the fathers, whether it is to be tolerated or not. But this we say freely that the mass which is now used throughout the Roman Church has been abolished in our churches for many and very good reasons which, for brevity's sake, we do not now enumerate in detail. We certainly could not approve of making a wholesome action into a vain spectacle and a means of gaining merit, and of celebrating it for a price. Nor could we approve of saying that in it the priest is said to effect the very body of the Lord, and really to offer it for the remission of the sins of the living and the dead, and in addition, for the honor, veneration and remembrance of the saints in heaven, etc. <It is the practice of the Roman Church to serve the bread to the congregation, but withhold the wine for the clergy alone. There is no Scripture to support this practice and though of ancient tradition, a most horrid practice that withholds from the body of Christ the means of grace and assurance that comes from properly observing the serving of the table as given to us in the Word of God. The Reformed have always demanded that we only worship God as God has commanded in the Bible. >
[1] WCF XXIX all – WSC Q96, 97 – WLC Q168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175 –HC Q75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82 – BC 35 [2] Calvin – Institutes – Book 4. Chapter 17. Sect. 10, 11. [3] WSC – Q91 – 1 Cor.3:7; 1 Peter 3:21. Calvin – Institutes – Book 4. Chapter 17. Sect. 19. [4] Calvin – Institutes – Book 4. Chapter 17. Sect. 2. [5] Berengarius (Berengar of Tours c. 1010-1088) Scholastic theologian who wrote extensively on the Supper of the Lord and caused much controversy during and after his life. He was the direct cause much high level discussion and caused the reconsideration of the supper and clarify transubstantiation. The language and terms used by Barengar and his followers in their defense opened the way to the scholasticism of the 12th century. (Oxford Dictionary pg. 160) [6] Deut. 8:3; Luke 4:4 [7] John 1:1 [8] John 5:53 [9] Calvin Institutes – Book 4. Chapter 17. Sect. 43. [10] Mt. 10:36-40. [11] Calvin – Institute – Book 4. Chapter 17. Sect. 39. [12] Rom. 5:1; Eph. 2:8 [13] 1 Cor. 11:28 [14] Calvin – Institutes – Book 4. Chapter 17. Sect. 38 |